The Notorious RBG

“I ask no favors for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is they take their feet from off our necks.” ~ Sarah Grimke

It seems like a great many people have jumped on the Ruth Bader Ginsburg bandwagon recently. In 2018, two movies have been made about her. One RBG, a documentary, was released in May.  The second, On The Basis of Sex, will be released in December (I’ll be heading to the theater to see it). Her intellect is marveled at, her exercise regime admired, and she has an entire Tumblr account dedicated to her exploits. The Tumblr account is where her nickname, the Notorious RBG, came from. Sometimes, people under close scrutiny do not fare well. The old cliché about how meeting your heroes, or examining them to closely, leads to disappointment can all too often prove true. But not so with RBG. The more I know about her life, the more I find to admire. This article showcases a small part of her story and just part of why I admire her.

When President  Clinton was mulling over Supreme Court candidates in 1993, Ruth Bader Ginsburg gave him pause. Her credentials, as always in her career, were impeccable; she was more than qualified. What gave President Clinton pause were the optics. Clinton privately bemoaned, “The women are against her.”  In a magnificent twist of irony, Ginsberg, who now is often hailed as an icon of the feminist movement, was not a popular choice with the feminist leaders of the time. Ginsburg’s voting record was in question. In the thirteen years preceding her appointment to the Supreme Court, Ginsburg had served in the federal court of appeals in Washington D.C. While there, her rulings had, at times, coincided with a conservative framework and feminist leaders worried how this record would translate to the Supreme Court and to female rights. They did not need to worry. Ginsburg knew exactly what she was doing.

RBG is smart. In my opinion, smart is too little of a word to cover what Ginsburg is. To me, she is intelligence personified. She began her law school career at Harvard Law, home of the Harvard Law Review. The Review is a respected and prestigious student publication with an impressive lineage, and Ginsburg was its first female member. She graduated from Cornell at the top of her class in 1954 and then at the top of her class from Columbia’s Law School in 1959. While her intelligence is obvious in her academic career, it is arguably even more apparent in her professional one. This is when the calmly calculated cunning of the Notorious R.B.G. came to the forefront. She was a woman who knew how to pick a battle, which was exactly what was necessary for her to make a difference in the lives of American women.

Ginsburg came into her profession in a time when women were widely discriminated against. For example, in Hoyt v. Florida (1961),  the Supreme Court upheld the exemption of women from jury duty. This ruling both denied women a jury of their peers and continued to maintain the narrow sphere women were allowed to occupy.  Nina

Anokarina. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg.” Flickr.

Totenberg, a legal affairs correspondent for National Public Radio (NPR), says that, in the time period (the 1960s), literally “thousands of state and federal laws discriminated on the basis of gender.” This environment was the impetus that led Ginsberg to establish, in conjunction with ACLU, the Women’s Rights Project in 1971. The purpose of the project, then, and now, was to ensure equality for women under the law. Ginsburg argued, “Men and women are persons of equal dignity and they should count equally before the law.” While a common concept in 2018, equality under the law for women was both novel and controversial in 1971. The controversy was amplified by the fact that equality for women was seen as a non-issue by many. More than a non-issue, many people believed gender inequality did not exist. In the years since Ginsberg has remarked, “I did see myself as kind of a kindergarten teacher in those days because the judges didn’t think sex discrimination existed.” Ginsberg believed to ensure equality for women, it was necessary to upend the “built-in assumptions about the appropriate roles for women and men,” in the legal system. The changes she desired would not happen overnight, but she was prepared to wait.

Ginsberg knew, for equality to become a reality, it was necessary to erode the framework which supported sexual discrimination. Until that framework was gone, nothing would truly change; and to accomplish that, she was going to have to play a long game. She would have to be patient. She developed a strategy, then, that would define the rest of her career; each move she made was “slow, but steady, and calculated.” While Ginsburg headed the Women’s Rights Project she made a point of picking cases she knew could win. On the surface, it sounds a little cowardly, until you remember Ginsburg was playing the long game. She was taking a macro- rather than a micro-view of the situation. In the early days of the Women’s Rights Project, Ginsburg bluntly stated, “Not all feminist issues should be litigated now, because some are losers, given the current political climate, and could set back our efforts to develop favorable law.”  By choosing cases she knew were winnable, Ginsberg set legal precedents to support the rights of women. Beth Ann Macaluso describes Ginsburg’s actions thusly,

“Bit by bit, Ginsburg [constructed] an unshakeable legal foundation for women’s equality, which would hold until society was ready to pass a more sweeping measure…explicitly banning gender discrimination.”

Using the precedents set by winning these small cases, Ginsburg was able to win five of the six cases she argued before the Supreme Court about gender equality. She waited, she chose her moment, and then she struck. This is one of the qualities I admire the most about Ginsburg, her patience. It must have been taxing at times for her to wait. I can only imagine how she must have had to steel herself, steel her team, in the face of the heartrending cases that surely paraded themselves through her purview. Still, she waited. Knowing that striking too soon was deadly for her cause, for women. Her patience, however, got her into trouble.

Her long game approach to winning equality was condemned as slow by many feminists of the time. Understandably, they desired more immediate and sweeping change. Women were suffering, and Ginsburg’s approach must have seemed like anathema. Go slow? No! We need change now. However, Ginsburg was sure of herself;  both of the path she was making, and the change it would bring. She held her ground in the face of much censure.  Her contemporaries may not have always understood the course she was charting, but Ginsberg did not mind. Once the trail was blazed, everyone would be able to use it. In the end, her strategy worked. The rights she fought for and won, have made a huge difference in the lives of American women. Not just a difference, Nina Totenberg claims that Ginsburg’s work has “changed the way the world is for American women.”   RBG’s foresight was astounding. She saw a future few people of the time could comprehend. Her foresight, in my opinion, is one of her greatest qualities. Both her foresight and her amazing intellect were key in her successes. They are formidable traits. However, they are not what I find most admirable about her. 

What I admire most, is her firmness of mind in the face of pressure. Sometimes, in the face of pressure, I can find myself wanting to yield to the dictates of others. To just go with the flow. This is not always a bad thing. Compromise is a necessary and good part of life. It promotes harmony. And frankly, most of the time, compromise for me involves little things. Like dinner at my sisters. I want tacos. She wants Korean. So, we get Korean tacos ( which are very good, by the way). However, there are times when there is a more serious issue at stake. Times when I need to take a stand for myself, for someone I love, or for my beliefs. Under pressure and censure, I can feel my own surety waver. “Maybe I am wrong,” I think, “Maybe, I should give in.”  Then I remember Ruth. I remember her unflinching resolve. Her determination that her cause was just and her reasoning sound, and I take courage. When my cause is just, and my reasoning sound; I’m going to be like the Notorious RBG, and stand my ground.

© Julie Wright 2018

Works Referenced:

Cohen, Julie M and Betsy West, directors. RBG. Magnolia Pictures, 2018.

Picture Credit:
Anokarina. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg.” Flickr. Flickr. May 3, 2017.



Posted by

Julie is a full-time student currently studying English Writing at the University of Colorado Denver. She has been writing in some format for the bulk of her life, and eventually decided, why not pursue it as a career? She is passionate about people, but women, their inner strength, and their stories have a special hold on her interest. Julie’s fascination with the stories women tell is one of the driving impulses behind Julie’s contributions to this publication. Julie is also passionate about her family, books, cooking, books, nature, and did we mention books?

4 thoughts on “The Notorious RBG

  1. Julie-

    WOW! This was an awesome post! Your tone, writing style, and techniques are incredibly consistent and I am blown away at your talent for writing! It’s obvious within your writing that this is your passion, and that’s always awesome as a reader to pick up on. You can really tell the difference between pieces of writing that you’re forced to write versus those that flow straight from the heart. You’ve done that here, for sure! Great job!

    I also love the multimodal approach you’ve incorporated with hyperlinks and videos to accompany your writing. This fits perfectly with your subject matter and really accompanies everything so well. Kudos!

    In terms of constructive criticism (if any…):

    -In all honesty, there’s not much. If I’m going to get nit-picky here, I’d recommend centering the videos you’ve incorporated on to the center of the pager rather than to the left. Since your header image is centered, it would make the most sense visually to follow that same flow.

    Other than that incredibly specific and totally unnecessary suggestion, you’ve done an awesome job.



  2. Julie,
    I love your writing here and I absolutely love your choice of role model. Also, your title is flawless- I hadn’t ever heard “Notorious RBG.” Hilarious. I’m so excited to see that a movie is coming out about her! I’ll definitely be joining you at the theater.
    -I couldn’t open the second video clip. It said “unavailable” for me.Maybe that’s just a problem with my computer.
    -Personally, I always try to avoid phrases like “in my opinion.” You said, “RBG is smart. In my opinion, smart is too little of a word to cover what Ginsburg is. To me, she is intelligence personified.” Obviously it’s a personal preference, but I would say state these things as facts!
    Awesome job on this,


  3. Julie,

    Great work. I thought you had a nice balance of multimodal and textual based information. I enjoyed a run down of RBG’s accolades. I have just two critiques.

    First, the paragraphs are a bit long, breaking them turns a switch in the readers head that they’re making more progress. Smaller chunks equal an easier read, which will help people along with this article since it’s on the larger side.

    Second, I didn’t feel as though this had an original take on the Supreme Court Justice. A historical run down of Ruth Bader Ginsberg alone isn’t enough to keep an audience focused. While you did a nice job of typing up a rather blanket summary of her career with the odd detail thrown in, I didn’t feel like the article was bringing anything new to the table in terms of information or perspective.

    I would’ve liked to see you take a stronger angle on this piece. It would’ve made the article more engaging and given it more of a purpose than it currently has at the moment.


  4. I will always appreciate the use of media in longer pieces. They help to bring the reader into the piece instead of just staring at long blocks of text. I think it helps make for a well-rounded experience.

    I think I both agree and disagree with Alec. I think the history aspect of RBG is important to include when considering the overall publication bringing focus to important women. But yes, it does need a new angle to be presented in since this is already a common way of presenting her. In a sea of RBG articles, I wouldn’t be able to see this one being much different than the others.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s